Vibecode Personio
track this build5 steps, step by step0%A consolation build is possible, but the paid product's decisive value sits outside a solo rebuild. For Personio, maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow without payroll or recruiting automation. The hard boundary is european hr compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support, plus compliance, payroll, and regulated integrations.
You are building a lean indie version of Personio. Create the following project files first, then implement the application by following them. Keep the files updated as decisions change. Do not collapse this into a single README or prompt. ===== README.md ===== # Personio indie build ## Goal Build the smallest trustworthy replacement for the core Personio workflow for one developer or a tiny team. ## Scope Maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. ## Quick start 1. Install the documented dependencies. 2. Copy `.env.example` to `.env`. 3. Run the development command chosen during implementation. 4. Complete the acceptance checks in `BUILD_PLAN.md`. ## Honest limits This build deliberately does not replace: - European HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support - payroll rails - tax and labor-law compliance - benefits integrations - identity checks and global employment infrastructure If those capabilities are essential, use Frappe HR instead of pretending the gap is solved. ===== AGENTS.md ===== # Agent instructions - Optimize for a working, understandable weekend build. - Prefer the fewest moving parts that satisfy the brief. - Do not invent cryptography, security guarantees, APIs, or compliance claims. - Keep secrets out of source control and logs. - Add focused tests for destructive, security-sensitive, and data-loss paths. - Run the project checks before declaring the build complete. - Record any deliberate shortcut in the README under "Tradeoffs". ===== BUILD_PLAN.md ===== # Build plan ## Original build brief Build a closest honest personal substitute for Personio in an empty repository. Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Docker Compose; do not offer alternative stacks. The core loop is: maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. Make the first run work locally with one documented command. Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward. Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials. Implement employees, teams, roles, documents, leave requests, equipment, onboarding tasks, and acknowledgements. Use least-privilege roles and log every read or change to sensitive records. Add approval workflows, expiry reminders, export, retention, deletion holds, and encrypted backups. Keep compensation fields optional and never calculate payroll, taxes, benefits, or statutory filings. Provide a data dictionary and explain which fields should not be stored without legal review. Ship Docker Compose, health checks, disaster recovery, and an emergency-access procedure. Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states. Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs. Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path. Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps. Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane. Do not claim to reproduce proprietary data, network liquidity, regulated access, or frontier infrastructure. Deliberately leave out payroll calculation or money movement. Deliberately leave out automated hiring decisions or applicant scoring. Deliberately leave out tax, benefits, immigration, identity, and global-employment compliance. Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used. ## Required capabilities - PostgreSQL - private self-hosted deployment - strict admin access - documented retention policy ## Delivery order 1. Scaffold the smallest runnable application and document its commands. 2. Implement the primary data model and core workflow. 3. Add validation, safe failure states, and persistence. 4. Cover the critical path with automated tests. 5. Exercise a clean install from the README and fix every missing step. ## Done when - A new user can go from clone to first successful workflow using only the README. - The core workflow works without paid infrastructure unless the brief requires it. - Tests cover the highest-risk behavior. - Known limitations are explicit rather than hidden. ===== .env.example ===== # Copy to .env and document every variable when it is introduced. # Never put real credentials in this file. APP_ENV=development # Add only values required by the selected implementation.
You are building a lean indie version of Personio. Create the following project files first, then implement the application by following them. Keep the files updated as decisions change. Do not collapse this into a single README or prompt. ===== README.md ===== # Personio indie build ## Goal Build the smallest trustworthy replacement for the core Personio workflow for one developer or a tiny team. ## Scope Maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. ## Quick start 1. Install the documented dependencies. 2. Copy `.env.example` to `.env`. 3. Run the development command chosen during implementation. 4. Complete the acceptance checks in `BUILD_PLAN.md`. ## Honest limits This build deliberately does not replace: - European HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support - payroll rails - tax and labor-law compliance - benefits integrations - identity checks and global employment infrastructure If those capabilities are essential, use Frappe HR instead of pretending the gap is solved. ===== AGENTS.md ===== # Agent instructions - Optimize for a working, understandable weekend build. - Prefer the fewest moving parts that satisfy the brief. - Do not invent cryptography, security guarantees, APIs, or compliance claims. - Keep secrets out of source control and logs. - Add focused tests for destructive, security-sensitive, and data-loss paths. - Run the project checks before declaring the build complete. - Record any deliberate shortcut in the README under "Tradeoffs". ===== BUILD_PLAN.md ===== # Build plan ## Original build brief Build a closest honest personal substitute for Personio in an empty repository. Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Docker Compose; do not offer alternative stacks. The core loop is: maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. Make the first run work locally with one documented command. Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward. Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials. Implement employees, teams, roles, documents, leave requests, equipment, onboarding tasks, and acknowledgements. Use least-privilege roles and log every read or change to sensitive records. Add approval workflows, expiry reminders, export, retention, deletion holds, and encrypted backups. Keep compensation fields optional and never calculate payroll, taxes, benefits, or statutory filings. Provide a data dictionary and explain which fields should not be stored without legal review. Ship Docker Compose, health checks, disaster recovery, and an emergency-access procedure. Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states. Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs. Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path. Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps. Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane. Do not claim to reproduce proprietary data, network liquidity, regulated access, or frontier infrastructure. Deliberately leave out payroll calculation or money movement. Deliberately leave out automated hiring decisions or applicant scoring. Deliberately leave out tax, benefits, immigration, identity, and global-employment compliance. Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used. ## Required capabilities - PostgreSQL - private self-hosted deployment - strict admin access - documented retention policy ## Delivery order 1. Scaffold the smallest runnable application and document its commands. 2. Implement the primary data model and core workflow. 3. Add validation, safe failure states, and persistence. 4. Cover the critical path with automated tests. 5. Exercise a clean install from the README and fix every missing step. ## Done when - A new user can go from clone to first successful workflow using only the README. - The core workflow works without paid infrastructure unless the brief requires it. - Tests cover the highest-risk behavior. - Known limitations are explicit rather than hidden. ===== .env.example ===== # Copy to .env and document every variable when it is introduced. # Never put real credentials in this file. APP_ENV=development # Add only values required by the selected implementation.
You are building a production product version of Personio. Create the following project files first, then implement the application by following them. Keep the files updated as decisions change. Do not collapse this into a single README or prompt. ===== PRODUCT.md ===== # Personio product brief ## Problem A consolation build is possible, but the paid product's decisive value sits outside a solo rebuild. For Personio, maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow without payroll or recruiting automation. The hard boundary is european hr compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support, plus compliance, payroll, and regulated integrations. ## Product outcome Maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. ## Target user A serious builder who needs a maintainable product foundation rather than a one-off demo. ## Required capabilities - PostgreSQL - private self-hosted deployment - strict admin access - documented retention policy ## Explicit non-goals for v1 - European HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support - payroll rails - tax and labor-law compliance - benefits integrations - identity checks and global employment infrastructure ## Success criteria - The primary workflow is measurable end to end. - Setup is reproducible in a clean environment. - Failure, recovery, and support paths are documented. - Product claims match what the implementation actually guarantees. ===== ARCHITECTURE.md ===== # Architecture ## Starting brief Build a closest honest personal substitute for Personio in an empty repository. Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Docker Compose; do not offer alternative stacks. The core loop is: maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. Make the first run work locally with one documented command. Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward. Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials. Implement employees, teams, roles, documents, leave requests, equipment, onboarding tasks, and acknowledgements. Use least-privilege roles and log every read or change to sensitive records. Add approval workflows, expiry reminders, export, retention, deletion holds, and encrypted backups. Keep compensation fields optional and never calculate payroll, taxes, benefits, or statutory filings. Provide a data dictionary and explain which fields should not be stored without legal review. Ship Docker Compose, health checks, disaster recovery, and an emergency-access procedure. Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states. Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs. Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path. Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps. Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane. Do not claim to reproduce proprietary data, network liquidity, regulated access, or frontier infrastructure. Deliberately leave out payroll calculation or money movement. Deliberately leave out automated hiring decisions or applicant scoring. Deliberately leave out tax, benefits, immigration, identity, and global-employment compliance. Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used. ## Boundaries Separate the product into replaceable modules for interface, application logic, persistence, external integrations, and operational concerns. Keep domain logic independent from delivery frameworks and vendors. ## Production baseline - Configuration: validated at startup with safe local defaults where possible. - Security: least privilege, input validation, secret redaction, rate limits on abuse-prone paths, and no invented security primitives. - Data: explicit schema and migrations, transactional writes where integrity matters, backup and restore instructions. - Integrations: adapters around third-party providers, idempotent webhook or job processing, bounded retries, and timeouts. - Observability: structured logs with request or operation IDs, an error-tracking hook, and health/readiness checks where a server exists. - Quality: unit tests for domain rules, integration tests at module boundaries, and one end-to-end critical-path test. ## Decision records For each major dependency, document why it was chosen, its failure mode, and how it can be replaced. Do not introduce infrastructure until a requirement justifies it. ===== AGENTS.md ===== # Agent instructions - Read `PRODUCT.md` and `ARCHITECTURE.md` before changing code. - Implement milestone by milestone; keep each change reviewable and leave the application runnable. - Treat authentication, payments, encryption, imports, webhooks, and destructive actions as high-risk boundaries when present. - Never invent cryptography or silently weaken a requirement to make a test pass. - Use provider interfaces for external services and deterministic fakes in tests. - Add migrations and rollback or recovery notes for persistent data changes. - Log useful operational context without credentials, tokens, passwords, or personal data. - Update documentation and run all checks before completing a milestone. ===== MILESTONES.md ===== # Delivery milestones ## M0 — Decisions and scaffold - Confirm the runtime, persistence model, threat boundaries, and deployment target. - Create a reproducible local environment and continuous checks. ## M1 — Core workflow - Implement the smallest end-to-end product path with validation and tests. - Keep integrations behind interfaces. ## M2 — Trust layer - Add secure failure behavior, recovery paths, audit-relevant events, and data safeguards. - Test abuse cases and destructive operations. ## M3 — Operability - Add structured logs, error reporting hooks, health signals, backup/restore documentation, and deployment configuration. ## M4 — Release gate - Run a clean-install test, critical-path end-to-end test, dependency review, and documented rollback exercise. - Compare the shipped behavior with `PRODUCT.md` and publish remaining limitations. ===== OPERATIONS.md ===== # Operations ## Before release - Validate configuration and secrets at startup. - Define backup, restore, and rollback procedures and test them. - Document logs, error tracking, health signals, and alert ownership. - Set dependency update and vulnerability review expectations. ## Incident checklist 1. Contain the issue without destroying evidence or user data. 2. Record the timeline and affected scope. 3. Rotate exposed secrets and revoke compromised sessions or credentials. 4. Restore from a verified source when needed. 5. Document the root cause, remediation, and regression test. ## Launch constraint Do not market omitted Personio capabilities as implemented. The v1 non-goals in `PRODUCT.md` remain user-visible limitations until they are deliberately delivered.
# Personio indie build ## Goal Build the smallest trustworthy replacement for the core Personio workflow for one developer or a tiny team. ## Scope Maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. ## Quick start 1. Install the documented dependencies. 2. Copy `.env.example` to `.env`. 3. Run the development command chosen during implementation. 4. Complete the acceptance checks in `BUILD_PLAN.md`. ## Honest limits This build deliberately does not replace: - European HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support - payroll rails - tax and labor-law compliance - benefits integrations - identity checks and global employment infrastructure If those capabilities are essential, use Frappe HR instead of pretending the gap is solved.
# Agent instructions - Optimize for a working, understandable weekend build. - Prefer the fewest moving parts that satisfy the brief. - Do not invent cryptography, security guarantees, APIs, or compliance claims. - Keep secrets out of source control and logs. - Add focused tests for destructive, security-sensitive, and data-loss paths. - Run the project checks before declaring the build complete. - Record any deliberate shortcut in the README under "Tradeoffs".
# Build plan ## Original build brief Build a closest honest personal substitute for Personio in an empty repository. Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Docker Compose; do not offer alternative stacks. The core loop is: maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. Make the first run work locally with one documented command. Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward. Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials. Implement employees, teams, roles, documents, leave requests, equipment, onboarding tasks, and acknowledgements. Use least-privilege roles and log every read or change to sensitive records. Add approval workflows, expiry reminders, export, retention, deletion holds, and encrypted backups. Keep compensation fields optional and never calculate payroll, taxes, benefits, or statutory filings. Provide a data dictionary and explain which fields should not be stored without legal review. Ship Docker Compose, health checks, disaster recovery, and an emergency-access procedure. Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states. Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs. Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path. Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps. Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane. Do not claim to reproduce proprietary data, network liquidity, regulated access, or frontier infrastructure. Deliberately leave out payroll calculation or money movement. Deliberately leave out automated hiring decisions or applicant scoring. Deliberately leave out tax, benefits, immigration, identity, and global-employment compliance. Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used. ## Required capabilities - PostgreSQL - private self-hosted deployment - strict admin access - documented retention policy ## Delivery order 1. Scaffold the smallest runnable application and document its commands. 2. Implement the primary data model and core workflow. 3. Add validation, safe failure states, and persistence. 4. Cover the critical path with automated tests. 5. Exercise a clean install from the README and fix every missing step. ## Done when - A new user can go from clone to first successful workflow using only the README. - The core workflow works without paid infrastructure unless the brief requires it. - Tests cover the highest-risk behavior. - Known limitations are explicit rather than hidden.
# Copy to .env and document every variable when it is introduced. # Never put real credentials in this file. APP_ENV=development # Add only values required by the selected implementation.
# Personio product brief ## Problem A consolation build is possible, but the paid product's decisive value sits outside a solo rebuild. For Personio, maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow without payroll or recruiting automation. The hard boundary is european hr compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support, plus compliance, payroll, and regulated integrations. ## Product outcome Maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. ## Target user A serious builder who needs a maintainable product foundation rather than a one-off demo. ## Required capabilities - PostgreSQL - private self-hosted deployment - strict admin access - documented retention policy ## Explicit non-goals for v1 - European HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support - payroll rails - tax and labor-law compliance - benefits integrations - identity checks and global employment infrastructure ## Success criteria - The primary workflow is measurable end to end. - Setup is reproducible in a clean environment. - Failure, recovery, and support paths are documented. - Product claims match what the implementation actually guarantees.
# Architecture ## Starting brief Build a closest honest personal substitute for Personio in an empty repository. Use Next.js 15, TypeScript, PostgreSQL, Drizzle ORM, and Docker Compose; do not offer alternative stacks. The core loop is: maintain a small employee directory and leave workflow, track approvals and records, and export data without calculating payroll, automating recruiting, or making employment decisions. Make the first run work locally with one documented command. Store all user data locally by default and make export straightforward. Put secrets in .env, ship .env.example, and never commit credentials. Implement employees, teams, roles, documents, leave requests, equipment, onboarding tasks, and acknowledgements. Use least-privilege roles and log every read or change to sensitive records. Add approval workflows, expiry reminders, export, retention, deletion holds, and encrypted backups. Keep compensation fields optional and never calculate payroll, taxes, benefits, or statutory filings. Provide a data dictionary and explain which fields should not be stored without legal review. Ship Docker Compose, health checks, disaster recovery, and an emergency-access procedure. Include clear empty, loading, success, and recoverable error states. Add input validation, safe filenames, and graceful handling of unavailable APIs. Write focused tests for the core transformation and one end-to-end happy path. Create a README with setup, architecture, permissions, data location, and backup steps. Do not add accounts, billing, telemetry, analytics, or a hosted control plane. Do not claim to reproduce proprietary data, network liquidity, regulated access, or frontier infrastructure. Deliberately leave out payroll calculation or money movement. Deliberately leave out automated hiring decisions or applicant scoring. Deliberately leave out tax, benefits, immigration, identity, and global-employment compliance. Finish by running the tests and listing the exact commands used. ## Boundaries Separate the product into replaceable modules for interface, application logic, persistence, external integrations, and operational concerns. Keep domain logic independent from delivery frameworks and vendors. ## Production baseline - Configuration: validated at startup with safe local defaults where possible. - Security: least privilege, input validation, secret redaction, rate limits on abuse-prone paths, and no invented security primitives. - Data: explicit schema and migrations, transactional writes where integrity matters, backup and restore instructions. - Integrations: adapters around third-party providers, idempotent webhook or job processing, bounded retries, and timeouts. - Observability: structured logs with request or operation IDs, an error-tracking hook, and health/readiness checks where a server exists. - Quality: unit tests for domain rules, integration tests at module boundaries, and one end-to-end critical-path test. ## Decision records For each major dependency, document why it was chosen, its failure mode, and how it can be replaced. Do not introduce infrastructure until a requirement justifies it.
# Agent instructions - Read `PRODUCT.md` and `ARCHITECTURE.md` before changing code. - Implement milestone by milestone; keep each change reviewable and leave the application runnable. - Treat authentication, payments, encryption, imports, webhooks, and destructive actions as high-risk boundaries when present. - Never invent cryptography or silently weaken a requirement to make a test pass. - Use provider interfaces for external services and deterministic fakes in tests. - Add migrations and rollback or recovery notes for persistent data changes. - Log useful operational context without credentials, tokens, passwords, or personal data. - Update documentation and run all checks before completing a milestone.
# Delivery milestones ## M0 — Decisions and scaffold - Confirm the runtime, persistence model, threat boundaries, and deployment target. - Create a reproducible local environment and continuous checks. ## M1 — Core workflow - Implement the smallest end-to-end product path with validation and tests. - Keep integrations behind interfaces. ## M2 — Trust layer - Add secure failure behavior, recovery paths, audit-relevant events, and data safeguards. - Test abuse cases and destructive operations. ## M3 — Operability - Add structured logs, error reporting hooks, health signals, backup/restore documentation, and deployment configuration. ## M4 — Release gate - Run a clean-install test, critical-path end-to-end test, dependency review, and documented rollback exercise. - Compare the shipped behavior with `PRODUCT.md` and publish remaining limitations.
# Operations ## Before release - Validate configuration and secrets at startup. - Define backup, restore, and rollback procedures and test them. - Document logs, error tracking, health signals, and alert ownership. - Set dependency update and vulnerability review expectations. ## Incident checklist 1. Contain the issue without destroying evidence or user data. 2. Record the timeline and affected scope. 3. Rotate exposed secrets and revoke compromised sessions or credentials. 4. Restore from a verified source when needed. 5. Document the root cause, remediation, and regression test. ## Launch constraint Do not market omitted Personio capabilities as implemented. The v1 non-goals in `PRODUCT.md` remain user-visible limitations until they are deliberately delivered.
$ choose a build depth, inspect the files, then open the complete pack in your agent · this prompt is generated from the build plan · improve it via PR
People still pay for Personio because HR platforms survive because mistakes affect pay, benefits, immigration, and legal obligations, not because forms are difficult to render. The recurring cost buys sensitive data, access, retention, audit, payroll calculations, filings, benefits, employment law, incident response, and support, not just the visible interface.
xEuropean HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support
xpayroll rails
xtax and labor-law compliance
xbenefits integrations
xidentity checks and global employment infrastructure
Don't feel like building it? These folks already made it free.
all 4 free alternatives to Personio →· no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real
Personio pricing
| plan | monthly | annual (per mo) | what you get |
|---|---|---|---|
| core | custom | — | 1 legal entity; up to 600 work schedules; unlimited absence policies; e-signature workflows for up to 8% of employees |
| core pro | custom | — | Unlimited legal entities; up to 600 work schedules; unlimited absence policies and e-signatures; API and workforce planning |
free tierno free tier; demo only
billingcustom contract; annual upfront payment receives 10% discount
hidden costsAll active users count toward purchased licences. Recruiting, payroll, performance, compensation, surveys, and other apps/modules are separately quote-priced.
verified 2026-08-10 · source ↗
Vibecode Personio
Not really. Personio's value is not the code: Recheck price before merge. See the honest breakdown above.
How much does Personio cost?
Personio's pricing is usage-based or varies by plan · Pricing is sales-led; canonical amount is null..
What do I lose by replacing Personio?
Honestly: European HR compliance, payroll, recruiting, workflows, integrations, and support; payroll rails; tax and labor-law compliance; benefits integrations; identity checks and global employment infrastructure. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.
Is there an open-source alternative to Personio?
Yes: Frappe HR (A complete HR suite without the license bill; the server, backups and upgrades are now in your job description.) Horilla HR (Hire-to-leave HR in Docker; free forever means you own the updates and backups.) OrangeHRM Starter (The old-school HR suite: records, leave, attendance and approvals, with a real server and no fashion budget.) All 4 curated free alternatives are at vibecodeit.com/personio/alternatives. The prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.