Vibecode Shade

track this build5 steps, step by step
KINDA · weekend project
price $35/moyou'd save $420/yrbuild time multi-daycategory 🎬 audio & videoreplaced by 0 people

The search half is real and rebuildable. Extract keyframes with ffmpeg, embed them with CLIP, transcribe the audio with whisper, put the vectors in SQLite, and 'the drone shot over the bridge at golden hour' finds the clip on your own drives. The open-source stack for that is mature and the result is genuinely good. What does not survive the port is what Shade has grown into: cloud streaming so an editor opens full-res without waiting on a download, per-link permissions and guest access, review and approval, and a model pipeline that keeps improving without you retraining anything. Solo, on local storage, the DIY version wins outright. On a team, you are rebuilding a platform and calling it a script.

the project pack4 files · fastest path to a working personal build
README.md
# Shade indie build

## Goal

Build the smallest trustworthy replacement for the core Shade workflow for one developer or a tiny team.

## Scope

Walk my drives, pull keyframes and transcripts, embed both with CLIP and whisper into a local vector index, then search the whole library in plain English.

## Quick start

1. Install the documented dependencies.
2. Copy `.env.example` to `.env`.
3. Run the development command chosen during implementation.
4. Complete the acceptance checks in `BUILD_PLAN.md`.

## Honest limits

This build deliberately does not replace:
- cloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first
- guest links with per-link permissions and roles
- built-in review, approval, and commenting
- face recognition and shot-type tagging that improves without your involvement
- team sync, so everyone searches the same index
- the NLE plugins and Slack integration

If those capabilities are essential, use Immich instead of pretending the gap is solved.

$ choose a build depth, inspect the files, then open the complete pack in your agent

why people still pay

They pay because the search only matters if the whole team gets it. A local index that only lives on the editor's machine solves the editor's problem and nobody else's, and the person who most needs to find the clip is usually the one furthest from the storage. Shade sells the index plus the delivery of what the index found, and the second half is the expensive one.

what you lose

xcloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first

xguest links with per-link permissions and roles

xbuilt-in review, approval, and commenting

xface recognition and shot-type tagging that improves without your involvement

xteam sync, so everyone searches the same index

xthe NLE plugins and Slack integration

share on X ↗"I just replaced Shade ($35/mo) with one prompt"
the escape hatch

Don't feel like building it? These folks already made it free.

ResourceSpaceFaces, sentence search and local transcripts in an old-school DAM; installation has not discovered joy.58aug 2026open source

no votes, no pay-to-list · just what's real

the numbers

Shade pricing

planmonthlyannual (per mo)what you get
growth$35/user$29.75/user1 workspace; up to 15 paid seats; 150 guests; 500 GB active storage/seat
enterprisecustomUnlimited workspaces and seats; 250 guests; 1 TB active storage/seat; 1 TB bring-your-own S3 storage/seat

free tierno free tier; trial length and numeric trial caps are not publicly disclosed

billingmonthly + annual (15% lower)

hidden costsGrowth is capped at one workspace and 15 paid seats; storage expansion and enterprise bring-your-own-storage workflows require a higher plan or add-on.

verified 2026-08-14 · source ↗

questions
Vibecode Shade

Kinda. The core of Shade is buildable in a weekend with the prompt on this page, but there are real gaps: cloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first, guest links with per-link permissions and roles. Read the honest list above before committing.

How much does Shade cost?

Shade costs about $35/month (Growth, checked 2026-07-30), which is $420 per year.

What do I lose by replacing Shade?

Honestly: cloud streaming of full-res files without downloading them first; guest links with per-link permissions and roles; built-in review, approval, and commenting; face recognition and shot-type tagging that improves without your involvement; team sync, so everyone searches the same index; the NLE plugins and Slack integration. If any of those are load-bearing for you, keep paying.

Is there an open-source alternative to Shade?

Yes: ResourceSpace (Faces, sentence search and local transcripts in an old-school DAM; installation has not discovered joy.) The prompt is for when you want it exactly your way.